Um trader de NFT ficou arrasado na sexta-feira ao descobrir que um CryptoPunk que ele comprou por 77 Ethereum virou fumaça depois que ele acidentalmente enviou a peça de arte digital cara para um endereço de gravação.
Today I accidentally burned a @cryptopunksnfts trying to wrap punk 685.
I was so focused on following the instructions exactly, that I slipped up, destroying a third of of my net worth in a single transaction. @yugalabs please sell me the @v1punks 685 as a consolation. 🙏🏼 pic.twitter.com/jHoTGvlc7j
— Brandon Riley (@vitalitygrowth) March 25, 2023
I would just like to make one thing clear. I was not wrapping this punk to sell it on Blur. It was to be my “forever punk”. The number is exact reverse of my ape. I was only wrapping it because I needed to borrow some liquidity from it.
— Brandon Riley (@vitalitygrowth) March 24, 2023
O CryptoPunk #685 valia aproximadamente US$ 129.000 em Ethereum quando foi adquirido por Riley, de acordo com o explorador de blocos Ethereum Etherscan.
This is truly a devastating mistake for me.💔 But I did this myself, and it is no one’s fault but my own. Both the beauty and the curse of self-custody.
Stay safe out there everyone, and please be way more careful than I was. Thank you to so many of you for the kind words. 🙏🏼
— Brandon Riley (@vitalitygrowth) March 25, 2023
— NFToga (@NFToga) March 26, 2023
Pedindo alguma forma de alívio, Riley perguntou ao Yuga Labs – que comprou o IP para CryptoPunks do Larva Labs no ano passado – se ele poderia comprar a versão v1 do CryptoPunk #685. O CryptoPunks v2 foi lançado depois que um bug foi encontrado no contrato inteligente da coleção original.
In the original Cryptopunks smart contract, there was a code error that caused Ethereum to be allocated to the buyer instead of the seller when a purchase was made. In other words, a buyer was immediately refunded for their purchase and was able to keep the Punk.
/2
— CryptoPunks ᵛ¹ (@v1punks) March 28, 2022
Créditos: Decrypt e Canva.